The Boardroom Review and Dissent
A boardroom review provides a table a way to evaluate their performance in a comprehensive manner. It helps table members identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and culture and also aspects of longevity. It also ensures that those who pay for table membership are prepared to perform their responsibilities.
This research area is still in the process of developing, and a number of difficulties remain. The current evidence-based evidence provides mixed results regarding how dissent can affect boards and their functioning. Some studies have positive (Zona 2016) curvilinear, non-significant, or mixed results. Some studies show negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. 2012) connections between dissent and a board’s task performance.
The literature does not offer more insight into the elements that impact the dynamics of dissension. Future research needs to develop a more integrated theoretical approach to understand this phenomenon of governance. This could include the use of techniques that use configuration (Federo and Saz-Carranza, 2018; Schiell, Lewellyn & Yan, 2023) in order to aid researchers in https://www.boardroombook.com/guide-to-board-succession-planning/ understanding the way in which attributes and processes are related to in a causal manner that is sufficient and necessary.
Finaly, some studies use a narrow definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. These studies are therefore vulnerable to measurement error. It would be worthwhile to develop more reliable methods to measure dissent in future studies.
